Search results

The purpose of this study is to investigate thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of graphene nanoplatelet-based (GNP) nanolubricant.

Nanolubricants in concentrations of 0.025, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5 Wt% were prepared by means of two-step method. The stability of nanolubricants was monitored by visual inspection and dynamic light scattering tests. Thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanolubricants in various temperatures between 25°C–70°C were measured with KD2-Pro analyser device and a rotational viscometer MRC VIS-8, respectively. A comparison between experimentally achieved results and those obtained from existing models was performed. New correlations were proposed and artificial neural network (ANN) model was used for predicting thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity.

The designed nanolubricant showed good stability after at least 21 days. Thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity increased with particles concentration. In addition, as the temperature increased, thermal conductivity increased but dynamic viscosity decreased. Compared to the base oil, maximum enhancements were achieved at 70°C with the concentration of 0.5 Wt.% for dynamic viscosity and at 55°C with the same concentration for thermal conductivity. Besides, ANN results showed better performance than proposed correlations.

This study outcomes will contribute to enhance thermophysical properties of conventional lubricating oils.

To the best of our knowledge, there is no paper related to experimental study, new correlations and modelling with ANN of thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of GNPs/SAE 5W40 nanolubricant in the available literature.

The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/ILT-03-2020-0088/

This paper aims to evaluate the dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) suspended in SAE 5W40 using machine learning methods (MLMs).

A two-step method with surfactant was selected to prepare nanolubricants in concentrations of 0.025, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5 wt%. Thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids were ascertained over the temperature range of 25–70 °C, with an increment step of 5 °C, using a KD2-Pro analyser device and a digital viscometer MRC VIS-8. Additionally, four different MLMs, including Gaussian process regression (GPR), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree (DT), were used for predicting dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity by using nanoparticle concentration and temperature as input parameters.

According to the achieved results, the dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanolubricants mostly increased with the rise of nanoparticle concentration in the base oil. All the proposed models, especially GPR with root mean square error mean values of 0.0047 for dynamic viscosity and 0.0016 for thermal conductivity, basically showed superior ability and stability to estimate the viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanolubricants.

The results of this paper could contribute to optimising the cost and time required for modelling the thermophysical properties of lubricants.

To the best of the author’s knowledge, in this available literature, there is no paper dealing with experimental study and prediction of dynamic viscosity and thermal conductivity of HNTs-based nanolubricant using GPR, ANN, SVM and DT.